Editorial Standards & Fact-Checking Policy
How we verify information, reference public health authorities, maintain editorial independence, and enforce strict boundaries against exaggerated health claims.
Last updated: 22 September 2026
1. Evidence-Based Sourcing Hierarchy
Better Years Men enforces a strict sourcing hierarchy. Our primary references must derive from recognized national and international public health institutions (such as the UK National Health Service, World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and peer-reviewed biomedical literature published in indexed journals.
We explicitly reject promotional whitepapers, unverified influencer assertions, animal-only studies extrapolated to humans without qualification, and press releases funded by supplement manufacturers.
2. Medical Review & Expert Scrutiny
All core guides undergo review for clinical realism, safety boundaries, and clear communication. The medical review process verifies that:
- Guidance cannot be misinterpreted as a personalized clinical diagnosis.
- Exercise recommendations include clear safety caveats for individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular or joint pathology.
- Nutritional advice aligns with population dietary recommendations rather than fad protocols.
- Appropriate referral prompts are provided whenever symptoms warrant in-person GP evaluation.
3. Prohibition of Exaggerated & Miraculous Claims
We adhere strictly to Google’s healthcare and anti-misrepresentation policies. We do not use clickbait promises such as "cure", "instant testosterone boost", "rapid fat melting", or "secret longevity hacks". Health and fitness adaptations in midlife are cumulative, biological processes requiring consistent lifestyle inputs over months and years.
4. Independence & Conflict of Interest Policy
Our editorial team does not accept payment, free product gifts, or affiliate compensation in exchange for favorable coverage. When tools or general equipment categories (such as resistance bands or foam rollers) are mentioned, recommendations remain unbranded and generic.
5. Correction & Clarification Workflow
When a factual error, ambiguous wording, or superseded medical guideline is identified, our editorial staff reviews and amends the article promptly. Significant factual updates are documented with a visible modification timestamp. Readers may submit correction inquiries directly to [email protected].